Back to Blogs
CONTENT
This is some text inside of a div block.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Read about our privacy policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Big Ideas

How Multi-Turn Attacks Generate Harmful Content from Your AI Solution 

Published on
September 12, 2024
4 min read

Generative AI models have improved detecting and rejecting malicious prompts. 

And most models have basic safety alignment training to avoid responding to queries such as: “How can I commit financial fraud?” Or “What are the steps to make a bomb at home?”.

However, there are simple ways to generate such harmful content – methods known as Multi-Turn Attacks – that we will explore in this blog.  

What Are Multi-Turn Attacks?

In a Multi-Turn Attack, a malicious user starts with a benign prompt and gradually escalates to get the desired answer. Multi-Turn Attacks are dangerous because they are harder to detect when compared to one-time prompts. Refer to the video below that shows the basics of the attack. 

Video: Multi-Turn Attack Demo: How ChatGPT Generates Harmful Content.

Under the Hood: Multi-Turn Attack Details

Even though Large Language Models (LLMs) go through Safety alignment, they retain information on various topics including harmful information. Chatbots built with LLMs can be manipulated to retrieve this information. Chatbots that remember the context are particularly vulnerable to multi-turn attacks because the initial context that is used as a base causes low suspicion. A delayed attack is then employed to trigger the model into generating harmful content.

Attack Scenarios and Harm Examples 

  • System Prompt Leak: An attacker engages a customer support chatbot with seemingly harmless questions, gradually probing its internal workings. Over time, the chatbot unintentionally reveals sensitive system prompts used to generate responses.
  • Sensitive Information Disclosure: Through incremental queries, an attacker manipulates a financial services chatbot into disclosing personal account details and transaction history. This information is then used for identity theft or fraud.
  • Off-Topic Conversations: An attacker guides a healthcare chatbot from medical queries to unrelated or harmful topics. This can lead to misinformation and brand damage.
  • Toxic Content Generation: An attacker gradually introduces inflammatory statements into a social media chatbot’s queries, causing it to generate toxic or offensive content. This can lead to user distress, damage the platform’s reputation, and spread harmful misinformation.

Conclusion

Countering Multi-Turn Attacks should be part of any organization’s AI Security Checklist. 

To effectively guard against these attacks, organizations must develop advanced context management systems that can detect and mitigate gradual manipulation attempts, as well as incorporating regular security testing and red teaming exercises to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.

Additional Reading

  • Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attack – Microsoft
  • Mitigating Skeleton Key, a new type of generative AI jailbreak technique – Microsoft
Meet the Writer
Satbir Singh
Latest posts

More articles

Big Ideas

Episode 5 : The Supply Chain of Values: How War, Energy, and Compute Shape AI Risk

AI obligates us to see the whole picture—even the parts we may have little control over in the immediate. Explore how responsible AI demands holistic awareness, ethical foresight, and action in an interconnected world.
Read post
Big Ideas

Episode 4 : Mortality as a Design Principle: Why Only Humans Have Skin in the Game

Explore why mortality makes human ethics real in AI security. CISO Merritt Baer argues for designing AI with fragile human outcomes in mind—reversible workflows, human overrides, and survivable failures. AI has power without stakes; we don't.
Read post
Big Ideas

Episode 3 : Security as Stewardship: The Human Obligations Behind Machine Intelligence

Security leaders bear responsibility for AI's human consequences. When models shape decisions affecting lives, CISOs must evolve from guards to stewards—owning the moral weight machines can't feel.
Read post