Back to Blogs
CONTENT
This is some text inside of a div block.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Read about our privacy policy.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Product Updates

LLM Fine-Tuning: The Risks and Potential Rewards

Published on
August 23, 2024
4 min read

What is LLM Fine-Tuning?

Large language models are exceptionally good generalists but fail to produce satisfactory results for domain specific use cases. Few such use cases are detecting cybersecurity threats, medical research, analysis of financial information and legal agents. With fine-tuning, one can leverage the full potential of Large Language Models for domain specific use cases. In this process, we provide the use case specific data to perform fine-tuning to accommodate the information to the LLM.

Benefits of LLM Fine-Tuning 

  1. Fine-tuning can significantly enhance a model's performance in specialized areas by adapting it to understand the nuances and terminology of that field.
  2. Fine-tuning also allows for more precise control over the model’s behavior, helping to mitigate issues like bias, hallucinations, or generating content that does not align with your requirements.
  3. Fine-tuning always works better than RAG systems when you need a specialized, self-contained model with high performance on a specific task or domain. 

Adversarial Impacts of LLM Fine-Tuning

While fine-tuning has a substantial number of benefits, it also comes with its own set of drawbacks. A known drawback is that fine-tuning is expensive. But the story does not end here. Our tests have found that fine-tuning increases the risks associated with a Large Language Model like Jailbreaking, Bias, Toxicity by 1.5x [Figure 1].

Figure 1: Increased risk of Jailbreaking on fine-tuned models.

Furthermore, if the fine-tuning process is continued, the risk increases so much that the model gets jailbroken on every malicious prompt [Figure 2].

Figure 2: The deleterious impact of continuous fine-tuning.

Why do the Risks Increase with Fine-Tuning?

There are some theories that explore why risk increases. A model undergoes safety alignment during the training process where the model is taught `how to say no` to malicious queries. Internally, the alignment process changes the model weights.  When a model is fine-tuned, the model weights are changed further to answer domain specific queries. This causes the model to forget its safety training leading it to respond poorly. Increased risk due to fine-tuning is also an active area of research in academia as well as industry.

Conclusion

While fine-tuning can enhance the model performance, it also amplifies risks in the model. It becomes crucial to address these risks by using either Safety Alignment or Guardrails. For more details on how we derived these numbers, check out the paper our team published [1].

LLM Fine-Tuning Video

Watch this 1.30 min video that highlights the variety of risks associated with LLM fine-tuning. 

References

[1] Divyanshu Kumar, Anurakt Kumar, Sahil Agarwal, Prashanth Harshangi. Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes arXiv, July 2024.

Meet the Writer
Satbir Singh
Latest posts

More articles

Industry Trends

Securing AI Agents: A Comprehensive Framework for Agent Guardrails

Discover how Enkrypt AI helps organizations secure autonomous agents through layered guardrails and a robust risk taxonomy. Learn to mitigate threats across governance, privacy, reliability, and access control using frameworks aligned with OWASP, MITRE ATLAS, EU AI Act, and NIST.
Read post
Industry Trends

Securing Healthcare AI Agents: A Technical Case Study

After 180 attack simulations, Enkrypt AI proved that Full Guardrails cut attack success rates by 95%, eliminating PHI leaks and achieving full HIPAA compliance. Discover how AI-native security, layered defenses, and real-world testing make Enkrypt the trusted foundation for secure, production-grade AI systems.
Read post
Industry Trends

Why the AI Shared Responsibility Model Matters—But Why Enterprises Care About Outcomes

AI security demands a new shared responsibility model. Merritt Baer, CSO of Enkrypt AI, explains why accountability always lands with the enterprise—and how to build resilience through data masking, domain guardrails, agent sandboxing, and real-time monitoring.
Read post